Most tech case studies read like press releases with quotes inserted. They list features, mention results, and hope prospects care.
They don’t.
As a former B2B tech reporter, I read hundreds of case studies. Most went straight to the recycle bin. But occasionally, one would stand out because it:
- Showed what really happened during implementation (including the problems)
- Included genuine customer insights, not bland quotes
- Told a story rather than listing bullet points
- Gave behind-the-scenes details that made it real
These were the case studies I’d use. I’d get in touch and ask if I could interview the customer and company for my article, or keep them for future round-ups.
What makes case studies valuable
Your prospects aren’t just evaluating your technology; they’re also evaluating your company. They’re trying to picture what it’s like to work with you.
A case study that only talks about “seamless implementation” and “impressive results” doesn’t help them. They know implementations aren’t seamless. They want to know:
- What challenges came up, and how you handled them
- How long things really took
- What surprised people (good and bad)
The case studies that work
The most effective tech case studies I’ve seen don’t hide the rough edges. They acknowledge that implementations have challenges and show how they were solved.
That’s what builds trust. Not perfection, just reality, handled well.
If your case studies feel more like marketing than stories, your prospects can tell. And they’re clicking away to find someone who sounds more credible.
About Sara Edlington
I’ve written for publications including The Times, The Independent, and StrategicRISK Europe, as well as for clients such as Data ProTech Group, MetaCompliance, and NWN Carousel.
Today, I specialise in explainer content for technology companies and agencies. Clear, credible, relatable writing that shows why your technology matters and how it can help solve business problems.